<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IBM (quietly) releases their JDK5.0 (beta)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unmanageability.com/index.php/2005/10/11/ibm-quietly-releases-their-jdk50-beta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unmanageability.com/index.php/2005/10/11/ibm-quietly-releases-their-jdk50-beta/</link>
	<description>Performance Within Reach</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 18:42:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael McCutcheon</title>
		<link>http://unmanageability.com/index.php/2005/10/11/ibm-quietly-releases-their-jdk50-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael McCutcheon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2005 03:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codeperformance.com/?p=15#comment-13</guid>
		<description>I tried the IBM JDK 5.0 beta on scimark and got a score of 304.  With the JDK 1.6 beta (using -server), I got 350...so the IBM VM seems to be slower, atleast in this benchmark.

Anyone else got any benchmarks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried the IBM JDK 5.0 beta on scimark and got a score of 304.  With the JDK 1.6 beta (using -server), I got 350&#8230;so the IBM VM seems to be slower, atleast in this benchmark.</p>
<p>Anyone else got any benchmarks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Code Performance</title>
		<link>http://unmanageability.com/index.php/2005/10/11/ibm-quietly-releases-their-jdk50-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Code Performance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 00:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codeperformance.com/?p=15#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Dan Nelson: 

J9 runs on (from Kevin Stoodley&#039;s slides):

PowerPC (AIX, Linux, OSE, QNX, WinCE, Mac OS X)
IA32 (Windows, Linux, QNX, Neutrino)
Sparc (Solaris)
ARM (Linux, QNX, PocketPC)
SH4 (WinCE, Itron, QNX)
SH3 (WinCE)
MIPS (PocketPC, QNX)
68K (PalmOS)
390 (Linux)
Others--supported by VM Builder (Alpha, PA-RISC, X86-64, IA64, ...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan Nelson: </p>
<p>J9 runs on (from Kevin Stoodley&#8217;s slides):</p>
<p>PowerPC (AIX, Linux, OSE, QNX, WinCE, Mac OS X)<br />
IA32 (Windows, Linux, QNX, Neutrino)<br />
Sparc (Solaris)<br />
ARM (Linux, QNX, PocketPC)<br />
SH4 (WinCE, Itron, QNX)<br />
SH3 (WinCE)<br />
MIPS (PocketPC, QNX)<br />
68K (PalmOS)<br />
390 (Linux)<br />
Others&#8211;supported by VM Builder (Alpha, PA-RISC, X86-64, IA64, &#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Nelson</title>
		<link>http://unmanageability.com/index.php/2005/10/11/ibm-quietly-releases-their-jdk50-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 20:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codeperformance.com/?p=15#comment-11</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see any source downloads, so you&#039;re still locked into using two OSes (and even the 1.3 and 1.4 only supported three OSes).  Sun IP or not, their JDK runs on a whole lot more platforms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see any source downloads, so you&#8217;re still locked into using two OSes (and even the 1.3 and 1.4 only supported three OSes).  Sun IP or not, their JDK runs on a whole lot more platforms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen&#8217;s Blog :: IBM (quietly) releases their JDK5.0 (beta)</title>
		<link>http://unmanageability.com/index.php/2005/10/11/ibm-quietly-releases-their-jdk50-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen&#8217;s Blog :: IBM (quietly) releases their JDK5.0 (beta)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 05:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codeperformance.com/?p=15#comment-10</guid>
		<description>[...] http://codeperformance.com/index.php/2005/10/11/ibm-quietly-releases-their-jdk50-beta/      Comments &#187; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://codeperformance.com/index.php/2005/10/11/ibm-quietly-releases-their-jdk50-beta/" rel="nofollow">http://codeperformance.com/index.php/2005/10/11/ibm-quietly-releases-their-jdk50-beta/</a>      Comments &raquo; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harish Madhavan</title>
		<link>http://unmanageability.com/index.php/2005/10/11/ibm-quietly-releases-their-jdk50-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Harish Madhavan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 07:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codeperformance.com/?p=15#comment-9</guid>
		<description>If you just look at recent times, the number of installations on IBM based products are increasing ! *Quiety* releasing a JDK which is going to be(in future) the base for most of the applications deployed in future is just worrying !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you just look at recent times, the number of installations on IBM based products are increasing ! *Quiety* releasing a JDK which is going to be(in future) the base for most of the applications deployed in future is just worrying !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Lothian</title>
		<link>http://unmanageability.com/index.php/2005/10/11/ibm-quietly-releases-their-jdk50-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Lothian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 23:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codeperformance.com/?p=15#comment-8</guid>
		<description>It is true that J9 itself doesn&#039;t have any Sun IP, but the IBM JDK libraries &lt;b&gt;are&lt;/b&gt;  derived from the Sun libraries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is true that J9 itself doesn&#8217;t have any Sun IP, but the IBM JDK libraries <b>are</b>  derived from the Sun libraries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
