<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Performance Within Reach &#187; Availability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unmanageability.com/index.php/category/availability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unmanageability.com</link>
	<description>Performance Within Reach</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 19:19:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Scalability chez Wall Street vs. chez Web2.0s</title>
		<link>http://unmanageability.com/index.php/2007/10/04/scalabity-chez-wall-street-vs-chez-web20s/</link>
		<comments>http://unmanageability.com/index.php/2007/10/04/scalabity-chez-wall-street-vs-chez-web20s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 03:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Coder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Availability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scalability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[map reduce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codeperformance.com/index.php/2007/10/04/scalabity-chez-wall-street-vs-chez-web20s/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nati Shalom&#8217;s Blog: Why most large-scale Web sites are not written in Java
&#8230;similar solutions for addressing the scalability challenges:
On the Data Tier we see the following:
1. Adding a caching layer to take advantage of memory resources availability and reduce I/O overhead
2. Moving from a database-centric approach to partitioning, aka shards
On the Business Logic Tier:
3. Adding parallelization semantics to the application tier (e.g., MapReduce)
4. Moving to scale-out application models to achieve linear scalability
5. Moving away from the classic two-phase commit and ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://natishalom.typepad.com/nati_shaloms_blog/2007/10/why-most-scalab.html">Nati Shalom&#8217;s Blog: Why most large-scale Web sites are not written in Java</a></p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;similar solutions for addressing the scalability challenges:</p>
<p>On the Data Tier we see the following:</p>
<p>1. Adding a caching layer to take advantage of memory resources availability and reduce I/O overhead</p>
<p>2. Moving from a database-centric approach to partitioning, aka <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shard">shards</a></p>
<p>On the Business Logic Tier:</p>
<p>3. Adding parallelization semantics to the application tier (e.g., MapReduce)</p>
<p>4. Moving to scale-out application models to achieve linear scalability</p>
<p>5. Moving away from the classic two-phase commit and XA for transaction processing  (See: <a href="http://natishalom.typepad.com/nati_shaloms_blog/2007/08/lessons-from-am.html">Lessons from Pat Helland: Life Beyond Distributed Transactions</a>)</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unmanageability.com/index.php/2007/10/04/scalabity-chez-wall-street-vs-chez-web20s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Dolphin let us save the compiled code cache?</title>
		<link>http://unmanageability.com/index.php/2006/06/23/will-dolphin-let-us-save-the-compiled-code-cache/</link>
		<comments>http://unmanageability.com/index.php/2006/06/23/will-dolphin-let-us-save-the-compiled-code-cache/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 09:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Coder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Availability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JVM Runtime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reliability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codeperformance.com/index.php/2006/06/23/will-dolphin-let-us-save-the-compiled-code-cache/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More tiered compilation
&#8230; a repository of information collected from one run and used on another run is on the list for things we want to do in Dolphin. It&#8217;s actually on the runtime groups list but we will certainly take advantage of it. There has also been talk of using annotations to give the jit a hint. This actually isn&#8217;t too popular since it is too much like &#8220;register&#8221; declarations in C. It&#8217;s only a hint and is too often ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/fatcatair">More tiered compilation</a></p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230; a repository of information collected from one run and used on another run is on the list for things we want to do in Dolphin. It&#8217;s actually on the runtime groups list but we will certainly take advantage of it. There has also been talk of using annotations to give the jit a hint. This actually isn&#8217;t too popular since it is too much like &#8220;register&#8221; declarations in C. It&#8217;s only a hint and is too often abused.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unmanageability.com/index.php/2006/06/23/will-dolphin-let-us-save-the-compiled-code-cache/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Google uses Berkeley DB HA for user authentication&#8230; a case study.</title>
		<link>http://unmanageability.com/index.php/2006/01/06/how-google-uses-berkeley-db-ha-for-user-authentication-a-case-study/</link>
		<comments>http://unmanageability.com/index.php/2006/01/06/how-google-uses-berkeley-db-ha-for-user-authentication-a-case-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 06:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>coder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Availability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Databases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scalability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codeperformance.com/index.php/2006/01/06/how-google-uses-berkeley-db-ha-for-user-authentication-a-case-study/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This case study gives a high level overview of Google&#8217;s setup for user authentication, interesting read.
&#8230; user authentication is a transactional event that requires fast, reliable, scalable, persistence and robust high-availability. To deliver this level of service, Google Accounts uses Berkeley DB HA for the storage and retrieval of user data and for replication, thereby ensuring scalability and availability.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.sleepycat.com/customers/pdfs/cs_google_1005D.pdf">This case study</a> gives a high level overview of Google&#8217;s setup for user authentication, interesting read.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230; user authentication is a transactional event that requires fast, reliable, scalable, persistence and robust high-availability. To deliver this level of service, Google Accounts uses <a href="http://www.sleepycat.com/products/bdb.html">Berkeley DB HA</a> for the storage and retrieval of user data and for replication, thereby ensuring scalability and availability.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unmanageability.com/index.php/2006/01/06/how-google-uses-berkeley-db-ha-for-user-authentication-a-case-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
