<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Performance Within Reach &#187; IO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unmanageability.com/index.php/category/io/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unmanageability.com</link>
	<description>Performance Within Reach</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 19:19:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is OS specific interruptible I/O a Java portability headache?</title>
		<link>http://unmanageability.com/index.php/2006/06/23/is-os-specific-interruptible-io-a-java-portability-headache/</link>
		<comments>http://unmanageability.com/index.php/2006/06/23/is-os-specific-interruptible-io-a-java-portability-headache/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 08:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Coder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JVM Runtime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codeperformance.com/index.php/2006/06/23/is-os-specific-interruptible-io-a-java-portability-headache/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Java Portability
&#8230;this program below does nothing visible on Solaris, but prints &#8220;hello&#8221; with Sun Java SE on Linux and Windows:
public class Foo {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
System.out.println(&#8220;hello&#8221;);
}
}
First impressions of this program&#8217;s behavior on Solaris roughly translate to &#8220;The hell you say!&#8221; followed by &#8220;Java is broken on Solaris!&#8221; There are a number of &#8220;symptoms&#8221; of interruptible I/O that catch users off guard and in a few cases one is led to wonder if it might be best to do ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/microwaves/20060622"><strong>Java Portability</strong></a></p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;this program below does nothing visible on Solaris, but prints &#8220;hello&#8221; with Sun Java SE on Linux and Windows:<br />
<strong>public class Foo {<br />
public static void main(String[] args) {<br />
Thread.currentThread().interrupt();<br />
System.out.println(&#8220;hello&#8221;);<br />
}<br />
}</strong><br />
First impressions of this program&#8217;s behavior on Solaris roughly translate to &#8220;The hell you say!&#8221; followed by &#8220;Java is broken on Solaris!&#8221; There are a number of &#8220;symptoms&#8221; of interruptible I/O that catch users off guard and in a few cases one is led to wonder if it might be best to do without this feature whose flip side is that it allows &#8220;breaking out&#8221; of I/O operations that folks really want to be able to escape from.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unmanageability.com/index.php/2006/06/23/is-os-specific-interruptible-io-a-java-portability-headache/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Notable articles on DDJ in 2005</title>
		<link>http://unmanageability.com/index.php/2005/12/29/notable-articles-on-ddj-in-2005/</link>
		<comments>http://unmanageability.com/index.php/2005/12/29/notable-articles-on-ddj-in-2005/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 07:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Coder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[C++]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codeperformance.com/index.php/2005/12/29/notable-articles-on-ddj-in-2005/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
   Micro Benchmarking  C++, C#, and Java  , Elementary tests for comparing languages, by Thomas Bruckschlegel, ToMMTi-Systems
High-Performance I/O With Java NIO,  How Orbitz.com improved throughput and performance  using NIO, by Brian Pontarelli, Orbitz.com
High-Performance Data Management in Java, On-disk persistent storage, in-memory data storage, &#038; cache management, by Charles Lamb

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li><a href="http://devnet.developerpipeline.com/documents/s=9851/q=1/cuj0507bruckschlegel/0507bruckschlegel.html">   Micro Benchmarking  C++, C#, and Java </a> , Elementary tests for comparing languages, by Thomas Bruckschlegel, <em>ToMMTi-Systems</em></li>
<li><a href="http://devnet.developerpipeline.com/documents/s=9851/q=1/ddj0509c/0509c.html">High-Performance I/O With Java NIO</a>,  How Orbitz.com improved throughput and performance  using NIO, by Brian Pontarelli, <em>Orbitz.com</em></li>
<li><a href="http://devnet.developerpipeline.com/documents/s=9851/q=1/ddj0507f/0507f.html">High-Performance Data Management in Java</a>, On-disk persistent storage, in-memory data storage, &#038; cache management, by Charles Lamb</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unmanageability.com/index.php/2005/12/29/notable-articles-on-ddj-in-2005/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comparing Two High-Performance I/O Design Patterns</title>
		<link>http://unmanageability.com/index.php/2005/12/25/comparing-two-high-performance-io-design-patterns/</link>
		<comments>http://unmanageability.com/index.php/2005/12/25/comparing-two-high-performance-io-design-patterns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2005 04:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Coder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codeperformance.com/index.php/2005/12/25/comparing-two-high-performance-io-design-patterns/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Comparing Two High-Performance I/O Design Patterns
This article investigates and compares different design patterns of high performance TCP-based servers. In addition to existing approaches, it proposes a scalable single-codebase, multi-platform solution (with code examples) and describes its fine-tuning on different platforms. It also compares performance of Java, C# and C++ implementations of proposed and existing solutions.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.artima.com/articles/io_design_patternsP.html">Comparing Two High-Performance I/O Design Patterns</a></p>
<blockquote><p>This article investigates and compares different design patterns of high performance TCP-based servers. In addition to existing approaches, it proposes a scalable single-codebase, multi-platform solution (with code examples) and describes its fine-tuning on different platforms. It also compares performance of Java, C# and C++ implementations of proposed and existing solutions.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unmanageability.com/index.php/2005/12/25/comparing-two-high-performance-io-design-patterns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
